King v. Edward Thompson Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, Judge. Action by tbe Edward Thompson Company against Emmett O. King and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPelt, J.
Appellee recovered judgment against appellants for $140 alleged to be due for law books. Prom this judgment appellants have appealed and assigned as error that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; that the court erred in directing a verdict for the appellee, and in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial.
The gist of the complaint is that on March 13, 1906, appellants Emmett O. King and Francis I. Stults, law partners, by written order marked exhibit A and made a part of the complaint, purchased from appellee the American and English Encyclopedia…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Over v. SchifflingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. ThatcherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Clarke Auto Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Glazer v. HookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- Sonneborn v. S. F. Bowser & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Commercial Credit Co. v. MacHtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.