Legal Opinion

People v. Osantowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 2008No. Docket 134244PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*105CORRIGAN, J.

This case poses the question whether a score of 100 points is appropriate for offense variable 20 (OV 20), which addresses terrorism, when a defendant threatens to cause harm using certain substances or devices but his threats, themselves, do not constitute acts of terrorism as defined by MCL 750.543b(a). We conclude that scoring 100 points pursuant to MCL 777.49a(l)(a) is inappropriate under these circumstances because that statute plainly requires the offender to have “committed an act of terrorism by using or threatening to use” one of the enumerated substances or devices.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. DrohanMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. BuehlerMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. OsantowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. People v. EricksenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. Hardy; People v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  3. People v. ArmstrongMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. BowlingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API