People v. Drohan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarkmAN, J.
We granted leave to appeal to consider whether Michigan’s indeterminate sentencing scheme, which allows a trial court to set a defendant’s minimum sentence on the basis of factors determined by a pre*143ponderance of the evidence, violates the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of one count of third-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520d(l)(b), and one count of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520e(l)(b). Defendant also pleaded guilty to a charge of being a third-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.11. The trial…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- People v. LockridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. EricksenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. HarversonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. NixMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. LopezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.