Legal Opinion

Ford v. Willits

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 5, 1985No. 55,585PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Briscoe, J.:

This is a quiet title action in which the plaintiffs, co-trustees, seek to quiet their title to an undivided one-fourth mineral interest which had been sold to defendant Willits at a tax foreclosure sale seven years earlier. The trial court entered summary judgment for defendant Willits, after concluding plaintiffs’ action was barred under K.S.A. 79-2804b and by laches.

Our recitation of the undisputed facts in this case begins with the creation of the Albert L. Bartlett Trust (hereinafter referred to as the Bartlett Trust) on July 19, 1940. The trust instrument named Walter C.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Cosgrove v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Beams v. WerthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Olathe v. StottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Ford v. WillitsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. In the Interest of L.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  4. Crone v. NussCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API