In the Interest of L.S.

Lorentz, J.:

C.H., the mother of L.S. and A.J.S., appeals the termination of her parental rights and further appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion to reconsider. We reverse and remand for new trial.

C.H. argues that her parental rights should not have been terminated because she was not afforded proper notice and opportunity to be heard. She further argues the trial court erred in denying her motion to reconsider by finding adequate service had been afforded.

*262The State first argues the natural mother has no standing to appeal the termination of her parental rights because on April 18,…