Legal Opinion

City of Olathe v. Stott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 29, 1993No. 68,355PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

The landowners appeal jury condemnation awards, claiming that the court erred by admitting evidence of petroleum contamination and, in the alternative, by not instructing the jury on their estoppel theory. The landowners also contend that the court erroneously excluded evidence and that the jury failed to follow the court’s instructions. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

On March 28, 1990, the City of Olathe filed a petition for eminent domain, seeking to condemn eight tracts of land to enable expansion of the 119th Street and 1-35…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Szoboszlay v. GlessnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Tucker v. LowerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Enlow v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Miller v. Zep Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Guillan v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Housing Authority v. Suydam Investors, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. 260 North 12th Street, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Shirley v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API