Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1945No. S. F. 17067PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1925. In 1938 they executed a property settlement agreement binding defendant to pay plaintiff $1,250 a month until her remarriage. A few weeks later plaintiff went to Nevada and sued for divorce on the ground that defendant had wilfully deserted her. Defendant appeared in the action, filed an answer, and at the trial was represented by counsel. He did not contest the charge of desertion, and plaintiff was granted a divorce on that ground. The divorce decree adopted the property settlement agreement. Thereafter defendant married another woman with whom…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Gale v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Estate of ChartersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Howard v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API