Legal Opinion

Desert Golf Cars v. Yamaha Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 8, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 99-0419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

¶ 1 Desert Golf Cars (“Desert Golf’) appeals the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict to Yamaha Motor Company (‘Yamaha”). Yamaha cross-appeals the trial court’s award of costs. For the following reasons, we reverse both the directed verdict and the award of costs.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 In 1988, the Scottsdale Princess Resort ordered a room services cart from Desert Golf. To fill the resort’s order, Desert Golf purchased a golf cart from Yamaha and modified it to better serve its intended function. The original Yamaha golf cart was changed by adding…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Pullman Standard, Inc. v. Abex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Piedmont Equipment Co. v. Eberhard Manufacturing Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Conrad v. SuhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. A.P.S. Rent-A-Car & Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Western Agricultural Insurance v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Bridgestone Firestone North America Tire v. A.P.S. Rent a Car & LeasingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API