Desert Golf Cars v. Yamaha Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
¶ 1 Desert Golf Cars (“Desert Golf’) appeals the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict to Yamaha Motor Company (‘Yamaha”). Yamaha cross-appeals the trial court’s award of costs. For the following reasons, we reverse both the directed verdict and the award of costs.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In 1988, the Scottsdale Princess Resort ordered a room services cart from Desert Golf. To fill the resort’s order, Desert Golf purchased a golf cart from Yamaha and modified it to better serve its intended function. The original Yamaha golf cart was changed by adding…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Pullman Standard, Inc. v. Abex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
- Piedmont Equipment Co. v. Eberhard Manufacturing Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Conrad v. SuhrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bridgestone/Firestone North America Tire, L.L.C. v. A.P.S. Rent-A-Car & Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Western Agricultural Insurance v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Bridgestone Firestone North America Tire v. A.P.S. Rent a Car & LeasingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004