Legal Opinion

Butera v. Fluor Daniel Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 26, 2001No. 84,972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

In this appeal of a workers compensation award, the appellants Fluor Daniel Construction Corporation (Fluor), and CNA Group (CNA) contest the finding of the Workers Compensation Appeals Board (Board) that Sean Butera was acting within the scope of his employment when his injury occurred. The appellants also raise a jurisdictional challenge based on Butera’s failure to appeal a preliminary order to this court.

Butera was an iron worker and rigger for Fluor. The nature of his work required that he be willing to temporarily relocate to remote construction sites and find long-term…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wright v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Angleton v. Starkan, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. ReelOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Blair v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Kennedy v. Hull & Dillon Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Khan, Azhar Ali v. Parsons Global SvcsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  2. Atkins v. WebconSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. Craig v. VAL ENERGY, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  4. Halford v. Nowak Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. Roles v. the Boeing Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API