Legal Opinion

Roles v. the Boeing Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 15, 2010No. 102,307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

The Boeing Company and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Boeing) appeal the March 30, 2009, order of the Workers Compensation Board (Board). Boeing argues that the Board erred in ordering a final award of $106,339.65 in medical compensation to Karen C. Roles. In addition, Boeing argues that the Board erred in awarding Roles post-award medical benefits for expenses incurred outside of the 6-month relation back period delineated in K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 44-510k.

Roles began working for Boeing on January 21, 1975. While working for Boeing, Roles has had a long history of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bergstrom v. Spears Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. GraceySupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Schmidtlien Electric, Inc. v. GreathouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Foos v. Terminix & Zurich America InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoesli v. Triplett, Inc. (Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  2. Jennings v. T Rowe PipeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API