Legal Opinion

Halford v. Nowak Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 20, 2008No. 98,258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

In this workers compensation appeal, the employer and its insurer, Nowak Construction Company and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company respectively, appeal a decision of the Kansas Workers Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) awarding compensation to the survivor of Nowak’s employee, Kenneth Halford, after the employee was killed in a truck accident. The appeal requires that we construe and apply the “going and coming rule” reflected in K.S.A. 44-508(f), together with its statutory and judicially created exceptions. We conclude that the Board properly applied the exception…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foos v. Terminix & Zurich America InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. Kindel v. Ferco Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Titterington v. Brooke InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. Blair v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Kennedy v. Hull & Dillon Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Atkins v. WebconSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. Craig v. VAL ENERGY, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  4. Johnson v. Transit Mgmt. of Se. La., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API