Legal Opinion
Hyde v. Atlanta Woolen Mills Corp.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 13, 1948No. 16379PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. A creditor may in one action in the superior court proceed against his debtor for judgment on his demand and to set aside a fraudulent conveyance, joining debtor and grantee. DeLacy v. Hurst, 83 Ga. 223 (4) (9 S. E. 1052); Vaughn v. Georgia Loan Co., 98 Ga. 288 (25 S. E. 441); Booth v. Mohr, 122 Ga. 333 (1) (50 S. E. 173); Fourth National Bank v. Mooty, 143 Ga. 137 (84 S. E. 546); May Realty Co. v. Forsdick, 180 Ga. 226, 229 (178 S. E. 660).
2. “A voluntary deed is void as to creditors, though the grantor be not insolvent at the time of making the deed, if his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DeLacy v. Hurst, Purnell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Hines v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. KontzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Booth & Co. v. Mohr & SonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Fourth National Bank v. MootySupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bloodworth v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Adams v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Security Feed & Seed Co. of Thomasville, Inc. v. NeSmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Abernathy v. RyleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Abernathy v. RyleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952