Legal Opinion

Citizens & Southern National Bank v. Kontz

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1937No. 11948PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Graham, Judge.

The plaintiff assigns error, in grounds 4 and 6 of its motion, upon the following extracts from the charge of the court: “I will instruct you, gentlemen of the jury, that if it was not the intention of the husband to delay and defraud his creditors, and the deed in question from Mr. Kontz to Mrs. Kontz was based upon a valid consideration, the transaction would be valid; provided that he was not insolvent at the time, and the deed was not voluntary. . . As I stated, in a claim case where the wife sets up title to the property levied upon, under a deed from her husband, and his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Culberson v. Alabama Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Morris v. WarlickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Savannah Electric Co. v. McClellandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Grooms v. GroomsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Peoples Loan Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Peoples Loan Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Jones v. HogansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Robertson v. AbernathySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Alabama Construction Co. v. Continental Car & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API