Legal Opinion

DeLacy v. Hurst, Purnell & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 22, 1889PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Equity. Practice in superior court. Amendments. Actions. Jurisdiction. Before Judge Harris. Meriwether superior court. August term, 1888. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

The bill in this case is made returnable to the August term, 1888, of Meriwether superior, court. It was addressed to the judge of the superior courts of the Coweta circuit, holding and exercising chancery jurisdiction therein. The complainants were Hurst, Purnell & Co. and others, styling themselves creditors of John M. DeLacy and DeLacy & Tallman, The bill was a general creditor’s bill, in which John M. DeLacy, of the county of Mei’iwether, and the firm of Swift & Hamburger, of Muscogee county, were named as parties defendant. It alleged, in substance, that DeLacy was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dawson Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Davis v. . McCreadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Lattin v. . McCartyNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. White v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Cubbedge & Hazelhurst v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Conley v. BuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Grimmett v. BarnwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Hines v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Railroad Commission v. Palmer Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API