Legal Opinion
Hines v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 1, 1927No. 5768PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. The allegations of the petition were sufficient to withstand. the general demurrer based upon the grounds that the petition fails to set out a cause of action, that the allegations are not sufficient to authorize the grant of any of the relief prayed for, and that the petition shows on its face that the plaintiffs have no right of action against the defendants on account of the facts alleged. A general demurrer will not prevail where part of the petition is good. Lowe v. Burke, 79 Ga. 164 (3 S. E. 449) ; Pryor v. Brady, 115 Ga. 848 (42 S. E. 223). A bad part in pleading does not make the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. BuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- DeLacy v. Hurst, Purnell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Munnerlyn v. Augusta Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Lowe v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Georgia-Carolina Brick & Tile Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Starling v. Seaboard Coast Line RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
- Wall v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Hermann v. MobleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. A. M. Pullen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.