Frazier v. St. Paul Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Alan Jerome Frazier appeals from a judgment entered by the Marshall Circuit Court in favor of St. Paul Insurance Company, holding that Frazier could not, as a matter of law, recover both uninsured-/underinsured-motorist benefits under an automobile insurance policy and benefits under the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. We reverse and remand.
Facts
Frazier was employed by Charter Communications as a line installer; a portion of his job responsibilities involved driving the cable company truck to install, disconnect, and repair cable. On December 7, 1999,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- LeFevre v. WestberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Quick v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Ex Parte CarltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CarltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
- Watts v. Sentry Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MasonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CauseyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
- Easterling v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- Johnson v. Coregis Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004