Legal Opinion

Frazier v. St. Paul Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 2003No. 1020505PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alan Jerome Frazier appeals from a judgment entered by the Marshall Circuit Court in favor of St. Paul Insurance Company, holding that Frazier could not, as a matter of law, recover both uninsured-/underinsured-motorist benefits under an automobile insurance policy and benefits under the Alabama Workers' Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975. We reverse and remand.

Facts

Frazier was employed by Charter Communications as a line installer; a portion of his job responsibilities involved driving the cable company truck to install, disconnect, and repair cable. On December 7, 1999,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. LeFevre v. WestberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Quick v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Ex Parte CarltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. CarltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Watts v. Sentry Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MasonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CauseyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
  3. Easterling v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Johnson v. Coregis Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API