Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Carlton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 11, 2003No. 1001781PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court granted certiorari review in this case to consider an issue of first impression involving Alabama's uninsured-motorist statute. The question presented is whether an employee, injured in a motor-vehicle accident while acting in the scope of his employment, who is barred by the exclusivity-of-remedy provision in the Workers' Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975, from suing a co-employee based on negligence, is entitled to uninsured-motorist benefits under his mother's liability automobile insurance policy.

I

In October 1998, Nicholas Shane Carlton was injured in a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. NielsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. LeFevre v. WestberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Otterberg v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. Continental Nat. Indem. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SlusherKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API