Legal Opinion

Quick v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1983No. 81-512PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) as to Count Three of a complaint filed by Steve and Carolyn Quick. Count three alleged the tort of bad faith in refusing to settle a claim for uninsured motorist benefits.

The Quicks were involved in a motor vehicle accident. Carolyn Quick was a passenger in a vehicle owned and operated by Mr. James Morrow, who was insured by State Farm. James Morrow's policy contained provisions for uninsured motorist coverage.

The Quicks aver that they notified State Farm of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Royal Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Inc. v. GriffinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Baxter v. Royal Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1975

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Pontius v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. LeFevre v. WestberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API