Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Causey

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 9, 2007No. 2:05-cv-379-WKWPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

W. KEITH WATKINS, District Judge.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) brings this declaratory judgment action to establish the rights of Defendants Brenda Causey and Kenneth W. Causey (“Defendants”), who are insureds of State Farm under Brenda Causey’s uninsured-underinsured motorist (“UM/UIM”) coverage, 1 stemming from a collision with a street-sweeper vehicle owned by the City of Montgomery (“City”) and operated by one of its employees. State Farm asks the court to declare that it has no obligation to pay UIM benefits to the defendants as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Frank M. OakleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Offshore Aviation v. Transcon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Continental Nat. Indem. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kendall v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Easterling v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  3. Rose v. SAFEWAY INS. CO. OF ALABAMA, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  4. Kendall v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Rose v. SAFEWAY INS. CO. OF ALABAMA, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API