Legal Opinion

Protection Mutual Insurance v. Mitsubishi Silicon America Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 15, 1999No. 96C13332; CA A98943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDER, «J.

This case arises out of an insurance coverage dispute between plaintiff Protection Mutual Insurance Company (Protection Mutual) and defendant Mitsubishi Silicon America Corporation (known as and referred to in this opinion as Siltec). The specific issue is whether Siltec’s general property casualty policy, issued by Protection Mutual, covers certain “business interruption” losses that Siltec incurred when it lost useable water and water discharge services due to a flood. Protection Mutual filed a complaint seeking a declaration that the policy does not cover the losses. Siltec…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Totten v. New York Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cochran v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. St. Marys Foundry, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Coats v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Bjugan v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
  4. Red Lion Hotels, Inc. v. Commonwealth Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Spada v. Unigard InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API