Legal Opinion
Federal Insurance v. Rivera
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur D. Spatt, J.
BACKGROUND
By notice of petition dated May 23, 1983, petitioner Federal Insurance Company commenced the instant proceeding, pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd [b]), seeking to stay arbitration as demanded by respondent Rivera by notice dated May 11,1983. Respondent Rivera’s demand for arbitration was made pursuant to the uninsured motorist indorsement of the automobile liability policy maintained by him with the petitioner. This demand arises out of an accident which allegedly occurred on February 19, 1982, *507involving Rivera as a pedestrian and an allegedly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Claim of Otterbein v. Babor & Comeau Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Boyce v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Viuker v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Nassau Insurance v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- De Persia v. Merchants Mutual Cas. Co., Auto. ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jelsma v. Scottsdale InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Eveready Insurance v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Home Indemnity Insurance v. BrugnatelliNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BatesNew York Supreme Court · 1998