Legal Opinion

Jelsma v. Scottsdale Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1989No. 87-794PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Appellees, H.L. and Tommy Jelsma, brought this declaratory judgment action against the appellant, Scottsdale Insurance Company, seeking a determination in the district court as to whether Scottsdale’s cancellation of an insurance policy was effective prior to a fire loss which occurred on July 29, 1986, and whether the policy was in effect as to the loss. From a judgment of the trial court declaring that the cancellation was not effective and that the policy was in effect on the date of the loss, Scottsdale has appealed. We affirm.

A suit for declaratory judgment is an action sui generis and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. General Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Quoug Tue Sing v. Anglo-Nevada Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Farmers State Bank v. Farmland Foods, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Smith v. ErftmierNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Pearce v. Elic Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Shelter Insurance Companies v. FrohlichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Davenport Ltd. v. 75th & Dodge INebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bowman v. City of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Katskee v. Nevada Bob's Golf of Nebraska, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API