Legal Opinion

Home Indemnity Insurance v. Brugnatelli

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Vincent R. Balletta, J.

By an order dated August 28, 1987, Justice Molloy set this stay of arbitration proceeding down for a hearing in Special Term, Part II, on the preliminary issue of whether the offending vehicle was insured. The matter came to be heard by me on October 23, 1987, and decision was reserved pending the receipt of the minutes and posttrial memoranda.

The essential facts are as follows. It is clear from the evidence that the additional respondent, Commercial Union Insurance Company, issued a business auto policy to a Miguel D. Guzman, the owner/operator of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eveready Insurance v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Federal Insurance v. RiveraNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ruffin v. State-Wide InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Nassau Insurance v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. ScriccaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Eveready Insurance v. HadzovicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Home Indemnity Co. v. de MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Jones v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Eagle Insurance Co. v. GervaisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API