Legal Opinion

State v. Wilbur-Bobb

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 21, 2006No. 55872-2-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 Convicted of vehicular homicide, Sandra Wilbur-Bobb contends the trial court should not have admitted her blood alcohol test results to prove her level of intoxication. To gain admission of blood test results at trial, the State must make a prima facie case that the blood sample tested was preserved with an enzyme poison such as sodium fluoride. In this case, a photograph of the vials containing the blood sample shows the vials were labeled as containing sodium fluoride. Along with testimony by the officer and toxicologist establishing the chain of custody, this was sufficient to make a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. State v. NewbernCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. In re the Detention of PouncyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State Of Washington v. Clayborn JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State Of Washington v. Juan Pedro Ortiz-vivarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State Of Washington v. Samuel RaymundoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API