Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Pouncy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 19, 2008No. 59034-1-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dwyer, A.C.J.

¶1 Curtis Pouncy appeals from an order authorizing his commitment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) pursuant to chapter 71.09 RCW, the sexually violent predator act. He raises four assignments of error: (1) that his right to a unanimous jury verdict was violated, (2) that the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the definition of “personality disorder,” (3) that the trial court improperly commented on the evidence, and (4) that the trial court erred by allowing Pouncy’s expert witness to be impeached through the use of findings of fact entered in an unrelated…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RikerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Detention of PouncyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In re the Detention of PouncyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. In re the Detention of TicesonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. In Re Detention of SeaseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. In re the Detention of SeaseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API