Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1987No. 53603-1PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

Quaere: May the State, in a rape case, offer expert testimony on "rape trauma syndrome" to prove that the alleged victim did not consent to sex with the alleged assailant?

*338The trial court held such evidence admissible, and the defendant was convicted of third degree rape. The Court of Appeals reversed. We hold that expert testimony on rape trauma syndrome is inadmissible because it lacks scientific reliability and unfairly prejudices a defendant accused of rape. We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand for a new trial.

The conviction arose from an incident in August 1984 involving the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. AlleryWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API