Legal Opinion

Flesch v. City of Lancaster

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The general rule is that a municipal corporation is not liable for torts committed in the exercise of governmental functions but that it is liable for torts committed in the exercise of private or proprietary functions. This rule has been limited in some respects by statute and in some respects by decisions of this court. The rule is sufficiently clear to be conceded by both parties. The difficulty lies in the application of the rule to a particular set of facts.

Essentially in the first cause of action the complaint alleges that the defendant operated the pool in its proprietary capacity and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Gensch v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Virovatz v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Nemet v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Orrison v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters v. Casualty Underwriters, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Hoepner v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Ball v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Rogers v. City of OconomowocWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API