Legal Opinion

Rogers v. City of Oconomowoc

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The circuit court ruled that the safe-place statute was inapplicable, and refused to submit questions to the jury upon a safe-place theory. Plaintiff challenges this ruling upon appeal. The circuit court reserved a ruling on defendants’ motions for directed verdict, and submitted the question whether they were negligent with respect to giving warning of the depth of the water. Apparently the negligence of the city was considered a possible issue because of a claim that its immunity had been waived by the form of insurance policy it obtained, and decision on that claim was reserved.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Koenig v. Milwaukee Blood Center, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Marshall v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Waldman v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of JanesvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Cegelski v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Wasserman v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ruppa v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gould v. Allstar Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Voeltzke v. Kenosha Memorial Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Leitner v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Coste v. City of SuperiorDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API