State ex rel. Honeyman v. Commissioners of Miami
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The instant case presents many of the same legal problems as that of Kroplin v. Truax, Director of Agriculture, ante, 610, 165 N. E., 498, this day decided, and we deem it unnecessary to repeat and redecide those questions here. An addi*629tional question, however, is presented by that part of the petition which prays that an injunction be granted to restrain the board of commissioners of Miami county from appropriating any public funds of the county in pursuance of Section 1121-17, General Code. This section reads as follows :
“The county commissioners in their respective counties are hereby…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kroplin v. TruaxOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Chambers, County Judge v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Mackenzie v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Civic Federation v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Albright v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921