Legal Opinion

Chambers, County Judge v. Gilbert

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1897PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from-Limestone. Tried below before Hon. Rufus Hardy.

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, Associate Justice.

Appellee, owning horses diseased with glanders or farcy, presented to appellant, on January 27, 1896, his affidavit of that fact. Appellant appointed three citizens to examine such animals and report their condition and value, if diseased. Being first sworn, they examined .said horses and found five of them affected with glanders, or farcy, and. in such condition worth $150, and so reported to appellant. Whereupon he ordered the sheriff to destroy said five horses, and the sheriff did so. All the foregoing acts were in substantial compliance with title 102, chapter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Somerville's Executors v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Raymond v. FishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Austin Nat. Bank v. SheppardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  3. Austin National Bank v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. People v. MaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Patrick v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API