State v. Able
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Dillard, Judge.
The State appeals the trial court’s grant of Catherine Lindsey Able and Tyler Bridges Selph’s joint motion to suppress evidence, contending that the trial court erred by basing its decision solely on a dislike of police officers’ “knock and talk” procedures. Because we agree that the trial court erred in its basis for granting the motion to suppress, we vacate the trial court’s order and remand for reconsideration.
At the outset, we note that at a hearing on a motion to suppress, “the trial judge sits as the trier of fact.”1 And when this Court reviews the grant or denial of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hendry v. HendrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Pickens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Holcomb v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- In the Interest of L. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Monumedia II, LLC v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- In re WhittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.