Frank Guido v. City of Schenectady, George B. Reynolds, Raymond Wemple
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge:
In July, 1958 Frank Guido was convicted in Schenectady Police Court of being a common gambler. The conviction was based on wiretap evidence of telephone conversations to which he was a party. In 1960 he brought suit in the Northern District to recover over $10,000 in damages allegedly resulting from the introduction of the wiretap evidence in the State trial, in violation of Section 605 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 605. Chief Judge Foley dismissed the complaint and entered judgment for defendants. We affirm.
During an investigation of gambling…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Schwartz v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Lee v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fuller v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Orth-O-Vision, Inc. v. Home Box OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Fine v. ESPN, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Chartwell Communications Group v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Ciminelli v. CablevisionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. Advanced Consumer Technology, Movie Antenna, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.