Fine v. ESPN, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
LAWRENCE E. KAHN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This libel action returns to the Court on Defendants ESPN, Mark Schwarz, and Arthur Berko’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Dkt. No. 45 (“Motion”); see Dkt. Nos. 45-2 (“Memorandum”); 50 (“Response”); 52 (“Reply”). Because the Court determines that it cannot now consider certain materials upon which the Motion is based, the Motion is denied.
II. BACKGROUND
The Court stated the basic facts of this case in a Memorandum-Decision and Order…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Hayden v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Roth v. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kinsey v. New York Times Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Wexler v. Allegion (Uk) Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Gubarev v. Buzzfeed, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. US Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Brooks v. City of UticaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.