Fuller v. Alaska
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Petitioner was convicted of shooting with intent to kill or wound and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Over petitioner’s objection that it was obtained in violation of § 605 of the Federal Communications Act, 48 Stat. 1103, 47 U. S. C. § 605, the prosecution introduced in evidence a telegram allegedly sent by petitioner to an accomplice. The Supreme Court of Alaska affirmed, holding that it did not need to decide whether § 605 had actually been violated since the evidence was in any event admissible in state trials under Schwartz v. Texas, 344 U. S. 199.
In Lee v. Florida, 392 U. S. 378,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. PeltierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.