Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 133 to 138PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Weight, J.,

We are here concerned with appeals of Harold W. Snyder and Lehigh Motor Freight, Inc. from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission dated December 9, 1957, in which appeals Agnes M. Smith was granted leave to intervene. On March 18, 1958, after hearing argument thereon, we refused ,the Commission’s motions to quash the appeals. It will be necessary to set forth the history of the proceeding in some detail.

On August 18,1947, at docket A.69567, the Commission granted a number of transportation privileges to Agnes M. Smith, who is engaged, as successor to her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paradise v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Reading & Southwestern Street Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Latrobe Bus Service v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. D. F. Bast, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Gannon v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Western Pennsylvania Water Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Sable Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. P. D. J. Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Neal Bulk Transport, Inc. v. Waddell, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Indiana County1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API