Legal Opinion

Reading & Southwestern Street Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1950No. Appeal, No. 3PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

When the factual situation here involved is simplified and the immaterial matters eliminated, the legal questions seem to be without difficulty.

The Beading and Southwestern Street Railway Company (called Southwestern) owns some 5.5 miles of street railway, extending from Reading to Mohnton, which it rented to the United Traction Company. This lessee later assigned the lease to the Beading Street Railway Company (called Beading). The lease was for a term of 999 years and has approximately 950 years to run.

Beading, in addition to operating a street railway company, acquired…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northern Pennsylvania Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Penn-Harris Hotel Co. v. Pa. P. U. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Reading & Southwestern Street Railway Co. v. Reading Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Penn-Harris Hotel Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rogoff v. the Buncher Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Leveto v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. DiSanto v. Dauphin Consolidated Water Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Allport Water Authority v. Winburne Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API