Legal Opinion

United States v. Clark

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 30, 1992No. 66,582; CM 8901402PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CRAWFORD, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a military judge of rape,1 in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 920. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 7 years, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence, and this was affirmed by the Court of Military Review. 32 MJ 606 (1991). We granted review to determine “whether the evidence of force and lack of consent was [legally] sufficient ... to support a finding of guilty to rape.”

I

Our standard in testing for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. HicksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. Strang v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. United States v. BradleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. McFarlinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. HuntUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. FrickeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API