Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Railroad v. Superior Court of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1894No. 15939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Petition in the Supreme Court for a writ of mandate to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Hon. John Hunt, judge, to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Motion to compel the respondent to settle a bill of exceptions.

After a verdict had been rendered against the petitioner it gave notice of its intention to move for a new trial, and caused to be settled and filed with the clerk a bill of exceptions which it had prepared, and also filed an affidavit made in its behalf, stating “ that after the court had instructed the jury, and the jury had retired to deliberate upon their verdict, the said jury returned into court, when the following occurred: The foreman of the jury, addressing the court, said: ‘The jury would like to be instructed,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bode v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kahn v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cross v. MayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Sprigg v. BarberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Marr v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API