Legal Opinion

Marr v. Southern California Gas Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1924No. L. A. No. 8223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is á motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant has not filed her transcript upon appeal within the time allowed by law. In support of the motion respondents show by affidavits and by the certificate of the clerk of the trial court that the time has elapsed for the preparation and filing of a transcript under the so-called alternative method, and that no proceedings have -been instituted by the appellant therefor, and they show further “that no bill of exceptions to said judgment or to any proceeding at said trial has been settled or filed, and that no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanna v. De GarmoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Southern California Lumber Co. v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Fogo v. Cutter Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Eley v. CurzonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API