Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2010No. 99 Civ. 11395PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Thomas Rittweger, pro se, (“Rittweger” or the “Defendant”) has moved for declaratory judgment to bar the plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Plaintiffs”) from prosecuting this action'against him, in view of the criminal prosecution against him resulting in his incarceration and the imposition of an order of restitution in the amount of $18,128,599.40. Upon the conclusions set forth below, the motion of Rittweger is denied.
The SEC has moved under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. for summary judgment against defendant Thomas Michael Rittweger…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. PennDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. McDonnellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WylyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Allied Markets LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.