Legal Opinion

Sung v. Hamilton

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided April 30, 2010No. CV. 09-00212 DAE-KSCPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS ROBERT EMMETT HAMILTON, SUSAN WEINERT HAMILTON, AND HULA BROTHERS, INC.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF SHIKWAN SUNG’S REMAINING CLAIMS; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS ROBERT EMMETT HAMILTON AND SUSAN WEINERT HAMILTON’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNTERCLAIM; AND (S) GRANTING DEFENDANTS BIG ISLAND LAND CO., LTD., AND GREGORY GADD’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing. After reviewing…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Santiago v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Yoneji v. YonejiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Pacific Stock, Inc. v. Pearson Education, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  4. Derosa v. Association of Apartment Owners of the Golf VillasDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2016
  5. Queen's Medical Center v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API