Legal Opinion

Capitol Cement Corp. v. Cement, Lime, Gypsum, & Allied Workers Division of International Brotherhood of Boilermakers

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided May 22, 1998No. CIV.A. 3:96-CV-689Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BROADWATER, District Judge.

This action is now before the Court for consideration of the defendants’ petitions for counsel fees (Documents Nos. 22 & 29), filed August 14, 1997 and October 27,1997 respectively and the plaintiffs Motion to Strike Motion for Attorneys Fees (Document No. 23) filed September 3, 1997. After consideration of the memoranda of law and in .reference to the Court’s previous ruling granting summary judgment, the Court grants the defendants’ petition for counsel fees and denies the plaintiff’s motion to strike.

I. Statement of the Facts

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 400 v. Marval Poultry Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  2. International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, District 776 v. Texas Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. Transportation Communications International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. Upshur Coals Corporation v. United Mine Workers Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. National Risk Underwriters, Inc. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company Of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API