Legal Opinion

Tradesman Co. v. Superior Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1907No. Docket No. 91PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Kent; Wolcott, J. Assumpsit by the Michigan Tradesman against the Superior Manufacturing Company for breach of an advertising contract. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

On the 5th day of January, 1903, the parties to this suit entered into the following contract:

“Ann Arbor, Mich., Jan. 5, 1903.
“We hereby authorize the Tradesman Company to insert our advertisement to occupy 24 inches on inside front page cover in the Michigan Tradesman, for 104 consecutive weeks and until further notice for which we agree to pay 55 cents per inch per week, payable monthly.
“ Extra space in anniversary issues to be $1 per inch.
“The Superior Manueg. Co., “Per H. H. Seeley.
“Accepted
“Tradesman Company,
“By Karl K. Alberts.”

Across the end of said agreement appears the following, “O.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farrell v. School-District No. 2Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cohen v. JackoboiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wigent v. MarrsMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. D. O. Haynes & Co. v. NyeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. William E. Peck & Co. v. Kansas City Metal Roofing & Corrugating Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Vitagraph, Inc. v. Liberty Theatres Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API