Legal Opinion
Wood v. Rex-Noreco, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 5, 1973No. 73 Civ. 653PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs move for leave to amend their complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order determining that this action may be maintained as a class action pursuant to Rule 23(c)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., and for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. class allegations from the complaint pursuant to Rule HA(d) of the local Civil Rules of this Court.
Plaintiffs, Jules and Beatrice Wood, instituted this class action on February 9, 1973 seeking damages against defendants Rex-Noreco, Inc. (“Rex”), several of its officers and directors, and Thomson &…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Abram Chasins v. Smith, Barney & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Mutual Shares Corporation, Spingarn Heine & Co., and Norte & Co. v. Genesco, Inc., and W. Maxey JarmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Consumers Power Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- In Re Seagate Technology II Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Umbriac v. American Snacks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Tucker v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Stull v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.