Legal Opinion
Mutual Shares Corporation, Spingarn Heine & Co., and Norte & Co. v. Genesco, Inc., and W. Maxey Jarman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 14, 1967No. 31123_1PublishedCited by 154 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:
We are again faced here with a claim that alleged misconduct affecting holders of publicly-owned securities violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“the Act”) and Rule 10b-5 issued thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commis*542sion. The complaint of plaintiffs Mutual Shares Corporation (“Mutual”), Spingarn Heine & Co. and Norte & Co., in the District Court for the Southern District of New York alleges violations of the Act and of state law by defendants Genesco, Inc. and W. Maxey Jarman. Judge Bonsai dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, holding…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by154 opinions
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,922 James Bloor v. Carro, Spanbock, Londin, Rodman & FassCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.