Legal Opinion

Foster v. Heard

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 25, 1988No. 01-88-00348-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEPHANOW, Justice.

Relator seeks relief from the respondent’s order excluding from discovery a post-accident investigation report made by the employees or agents of the real party-in-interest, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company. Before this Court granted relator’s motion for leave, Panhandle filed a response to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

The relator’s son was killed in an explosion on November 13, 1986 that occurred while the son was attempting to thaw a pipe at a Panhandle facility. On February 5, 1987, relator filed suit and then sought production of “all statements…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Stringer v. Eleventh Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Turbodyne Corp. v. HeardTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lindsey v. O'NEILLTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Phelps Dodge Refining Corp. v. Marsh, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mole v. Millard, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. In re Fairway Methanol LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API