Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Eleventh Court of Appeals

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1986No. C-5329PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original mandamus action. Relator, Vikki Stringer, seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Supreme Judicial District to rescind its mandamus orders which found information obtained in a post-accident investigation privileged under TEX.R. CIV.P. 166b(3)(d) and also reversed the trial court’s discovery sanctions order against defendant, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Kirk, 705 S.W.2d 829. We hold the information is discoverable because it was not obtained at a time when Santa Fe had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Street v. Second Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Allen v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Robinson v. Harkins & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Kirk, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1986

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Flores v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  5. National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API