Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

National Tank Co. v. Brotherton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1993No. D-1576Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDoggett, Justice

While a widow plans a funeral, the corporation in whose facility her husband was killed conducts an investigation. While family and friends mourn, the corporation obtains witness statements and prepares reports concerning the circumstances surrounding the death. If this occurrence is ever considered by a judge and jury, they should be able to hear the plain, unvarnished truth — to learn what really happened when memories were fresh and unpolished by counsel.

But now the majority2 puts a stop to all of that; it approves concealment of this *208investigation. As the family buries the victim, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. SterlingTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API