Legal Opinion
Mathers & Mathers v. Urschel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1935No. 1039PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
This controversy relates to a 16-cylinder Cadillac automobile. The parties will be referred to as they were in the trial court.
Plaintiffs, a firm of attorneys at law in Oklahoma City, filed a bill in equity in the United States court for the Western District of Oklahoma against Herbert K. Hyde, United States attorney for that district, and R. H. Colvin and Gus Jones, agents for the United States Bureau of Investigation, to confirm title and secure possession of certain personal property and to enjoin its disposition pending the suit. It was alleged that Geo. R. Kelly…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hall v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Defiance Water Co. v. DefianceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Gay v. RuffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Fibreboard Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
- United Nuclear Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Moki Oil and Rare Metals Co., a New Mexico CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Oklahoma City v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Latch v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
- Carignan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.