Legal Opinion

Defiance Water Co. v. Defiance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 30, 1903No. 21PublishedCited by 111 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. On the fourth day of January, 1898, the city of Defiance, a municipal corporation of the State of Ohio, ’ by its solicitor, filed a bill in equity against the Council of the city of Defiance and the Defiance Waterworks Company, in the Court of Common Pleas of Defiance County, Ohio, praying that future payments under an alleged contract of August 17, 1887, between the Council of the City and…

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. On the fourth day of January, 1898, the city of Defiance, a municipal corporation of the State of Ohio, ’ by its solicitor, filed a bill in equity against the Council of the city of Defiance and the Defiance Waterworks Company, in the Court of Common Pleas of Defiance County, Ohio, praying that future payments under an alleged contract of August 17, 1887, between the Council of the City and Bullock & Company, who had subsequently assigned it to the Water Company, for the furnishing of water to the city for…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice Fuller,

after .making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The decree of the Circuit Court was based on the decree of the state Circuit Court, which had been reversed by the state Supreme Court, and various suggestions have been made by counsel in respect of the judgment which they think should be rendered here in view of the termination of the litigation in the state courts.

But the question of the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court meets us on the threshold, and the disposal of that question disposes of this appeal.

Diverse citizenship did not exist,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Neal v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Newburyport Water Co. v. NewburyportSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API